One thing that's always puzzled me about JSP taglibs is the mechanics of tag reuse — what happens when you invoke the same tag twice on a page. The Tag JavaDoc says the following:
After the doEndTag invocation, the tag handler is available for further invocations (and it is expected to have retained its properties).
This statement sent up a bunch of red flags when I first read it. And it's done the same for others: I've seen tag implementations that explicitly reset all attributes in
doEndTag(). But if this was the required implementation, I'd expect to see it mentioned in the J2EE tutorial or sample code, and it isn't.
Moreover, the description makes no sense: you can't build a software system on components that will render arbitrary values depending on where they're invoked. My first hint came from examining the Java code generated by Tomcat:
private org.apache.jasper.runtime.TagHandlerPool _jspx_tagPool_prodList_form_visible_userId_operation_name_listName_htmlId_format; private org.apache.jasper.runtime.TagHandlerPool _jspx_tagPool_prodList_form_visible_userId_timeout_operation_name_listName_htmlId_format;
Those are pretty long names. And interestingly, they include the parameters used in the tags. And they're different. That led me back to the JSP specifications, with a more focused search. And on page 2-51, we see the rules:
The JSP container may reuse classic tag handler instances for multiple occurrences of the corresponding custom action, in the same page or in different pages, but only if the same set of attributes are used for all occurrences.
I'd love to know the rationale behind this — and whether it was intentional or a “retro-specification” to cover decisions made in the reference implementation (Tomcat). To me, it seems like premature optimization: assume that it's expensive to instantiate a tag handler or set its attributes, so go to extra effort to pool those instances. If, instead, the specification required handlers to be explicitly instantiated per use it would drive developers toward lightweight handlers that collaborate with external services. Which in my opinion is a far better way to write them.